Model comparison
Command A vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.7 to 33.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 10.3% for Command A and 29.7% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0765 / $0.26 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
Side by side
| Command A | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-04-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | 262K |
| Max output | 8K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.0765 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.26 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Command A: 26.8 (#317), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1446 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1359 |
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| WeirdML | — | 35.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 927.17 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.7 (#36), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Command A: 17.7 (#276), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1438 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 74.9% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 29.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.85 |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Command A: 33.5 (#172), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1469 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 82.2% |
Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Command A: 36.5 (#157), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | 5.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1447 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 73.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command A: —, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1260 |
Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Command A: 45.5 (#166), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1422 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | 1415 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Command A: 69.3 (#172), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1420 |
Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Command A: 40.6 (#147), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1427 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Command A: 47.8 (#204), Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1434 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1401 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | 1305 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1442 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0765 per million input tokens and $0.26 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command A or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better for coding?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.8 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT does, with 262K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28.