Model comparison
Command A vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 43.6 to 26.8.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
Side by side
| Command A | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 8K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command A: 26.8 (#317), MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1469 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.7 (#36), MiMo-V2.5: —
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command A: 17.7 (#276), MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1450 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command A: 33.5 (#172), MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command A: 36.5 (#157), MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1459 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command A: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1245 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command A: 45.5 (#166), MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1467 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | 1304 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | 1412 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command A: 69.3 (#172), MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1433 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command A: 40.6 (#147), MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1444 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command A: 47.8 (#204), MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)
| Benchmark | Command A | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1445 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command A or MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command A or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Command A and MiMo-V2.5 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.