Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.8 to 44.0.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 43.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207), MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1247 | 1469 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164), MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1450 |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219), MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210), MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1244 | 1459 |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1245 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223), MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1250 | 1467 |
| LMArena Russian | 1198 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | 1412 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178), MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1221 | 1433 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209), MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1240 | 1444 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222), MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1243 | 1445 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.0 H Small or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and MiMo-V2.5 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.