Model comparison
Grok Build 0.1 vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok Build 0.1 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.5 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 28.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 50.2% for Grok Build 0.1 and 43.1% for MiMo-V2.5.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 43.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 256K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | 43.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1469 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129), MiMo-V2.5: —
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1450 |
Math Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1436 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1460 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1468 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1416 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1434 |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1445 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.
Is Grok Build 0.1 or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.1 vs 43.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and MiMo-V2.5 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.