Model comparison
Command A vs Grok Build 0.1
Command A and Grok Build 0.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 36.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 43.1 to 27.2.
- Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $1 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A | Grok Build 0.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-04-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | 256K |
| Max output | 8K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $2 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Command A leads
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Grok Build 0.1?
Command A and Grok Build 0.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 36.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Grok Build 0.1?
Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command A or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 256K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Grok Build 0.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.