Model comparison
Command A vs Hunyuan Large Vision
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 37.6 to 26.8.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Command A: 26.8 (#317), Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1307 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.7 (#36), Hunyuan Large Vision: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Command A: 17.7 (#276), Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1257 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Too close to call
Command A: 33.5 (#172), Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1269 |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 36.5 (#157), Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1250 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command A: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.5 (#166), Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1289 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1243 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.3 (#172), Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1250 |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#147), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1279 |
Writing & Preference Command A leads
Command A: 47.8 (#204), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1250 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1253 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.