Model comparison

Command A vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified October 12, 2026. 17 shared benchmarks.

Command A

Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 47.6.
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Command A and MiMo-V2-Flash specifications
	Command A	MiMo-V2-Flash
Provider	Cohere	Xiaomi
Noometry Index	36.5	41.3
Released	2025-03-13	2025-12-16
Weights	Open	Open
Context window	256K	262K
Max output	8K	66K
Input $ / M tokens	$2.50	$0.14
Output $ / M tokens	$10	$0.28
Results tracked	24	21

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Coding	1330	1443
Aider Polyglot	12%	—
LMArena WebDev	—	1330
SciCode	—	25.9%
ALE-Bench	—	737.95

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.9 (#40), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Flash
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard	57.1%	—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts	1326	1420
Kagi LLM Benchmark	28.8%	—
CritPt	—	0%
DTBench	61.3%	—
LMCA	10.3%	—

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command A: 36.2 (#171), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math	1300	1396

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command A: 37.1 (#159), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert	1295	1425
Vectara Hallucination Rate	9.3%	—

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command A: 45.3 (#170), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English	1313	1392
LMArena Chinese	1327	1462
LMArena French	1351	1429
LMArena German	1341	1395
LMArena Japanese	1285	1325
LMArena Korean	1285	1358
LMArena Russian	1314	1387
LMArena Spanish	1347	1420

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command A: 69.1 (#177), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following	1309	1392

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command A: 40.6 (#151), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query	1334	1409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Command A: 47.6 (#208), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text	1331	1411
LMArena Creative Writing	1319	1375
LMArena Multi-Turn	1339	1404
EQ-Bench Creative Writing	1145	—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command A or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Command A and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.