Model comparison

Command A vs MiMo-V2-Omni

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 17 shared benchmarks.

Command A

Cohere

35.9

Rank #212 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

42.9

Rank #91 Confirmed

Summary

They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 42.7 to 26.8.
MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command A and MiMo-V2-Omni specifications
	Command A	MiMo-V2-Omni
Provider	Cohere	Xiaomi
Noometry Index	35.9	42.9
Released	2025-03-13	2026-03-18
Weights	Open	Proprietary
Context window	256K	262K
Max output	8K	131K
Input $ / M tokens	$2.50	$0.14
Output $ / M tokens	$10	$0.28
Results tracked	24	18

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command A: 26.8 (#317), MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Coding	1331	1467
Aider Polyglot	12%	—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.7 (#36), MiMo-V2-Omni: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Omni
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard	57.1%	—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command A: 17.7 (#276), MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts	1326	1445
Kagi LLM Benchmark	28.8%	—
DTBench	61.3%	—
LMCA	10.3%	—

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command A: 33.5 (#172), MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math	1300	1432

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command A: 36.5 (#157), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert	1295	1449
Vectara Hallucination Rate	9.3%	—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command A: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision	—	1228

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command A: 45.5 (#166), MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English	1313	1404
LMArena Chinese	1327	1469
LMArena French	1352	1448
LMArena German	1341	1398
LMArena Japanese	1283	1318
LMArena Korean	1285	1355
LMArena Russian	1314	1412
LMArena Spanish	1346	1432

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command A: 69.3 (#172), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following	1309	1428

Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command A: 40.6 (#147), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query	1334	1442

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command A: 47.8 (#204), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text	1331	1424
LMArena Creative Writing	1319	1393
LMArena Multi-Turn	1338	1446
EQ-Bench Creative Writing	1145	—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command A or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Command A and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.