Model comparison

Command A vs MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

35.9

Rank #212 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

42.4

Rank #102 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 43.4 to 26.8.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
  • Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command A and MiMo-V2-Pro specifications
Command AMiMo-V2-Pro
ProviderCohereXiaomi
Noometry Index35.942.4
Released2025-03-132026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window256K1.05M
Max output8K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.87
Results tracked2423

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Command A: 26.8 (#317), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Coding13311476
Aider Polyglot12%—
LMArena WebDev—1433
ALE-Bench—785.17

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.7 (#36), MiMo-V2-Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2-Pro
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Command A: 17.7 (#276), MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts13261457
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)—25.8%
Thematic Generalization—45.9%
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—

Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Command A: 33.5 (#172), MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Math13001447

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Command A: 36.5 (#157), MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Expert12951479
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Command A: 45.5 (#166), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Non-English13131416
LMArena Chinese13271455
LMArena French13521470
LMArena German13411417
LMArena Japanese12831366
LMArena Korean12851401
LMArena Russian13141427
LMArena Spanish13461458

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Command A: 69.3 (#172), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following13091444

Long Context Too close to call

Command A: 40.6 (#147), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Longer Query13341455
CL-bench—15.7%
CL-bench Life—6.9%

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Command A: 47.8 (#204), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Text13311436
LMArena Creative Writing13191415
LMArena Multi-Turn13381456
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command A or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Command A and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper