Model comparison

Command A vs Qwen Plus

Command A and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen Plus in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Command A leads 36.2 to 23.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 28.8% for Command A and 63.3% for Qwen Plus.
  • Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
  • Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
  • Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command A and Qwen Plus specifications
Command AQwen Plus
ProviderCohereAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.537.1
Released2025-03-132024-01-25
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window256K1M
Max output8K33K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$10$1.20
Results tracked2420

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen Plus leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AQwen Plus
LMArena Coding13301328
Aider Polyglot12%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.9 (#40), Qwen Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AQwen Plus
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—

Reasoning Qwen Plus leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AQwen Plus
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%63.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts13261317
DTBench61.3%81.1%
LMCA10.3%24%

Math Command A leads

Command A: 36.2 (#171), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AQwen Plus
LMArena Math13001326
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—17.8%
MATH Level 5—65.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Command A leads

Command A: 37.1 (#159), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AQwen Plus
LMArena Expert12951328
GPQA Diamond—48.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Command A: 45.3 (#170), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AQwen Plus
LMArena Non-English13131310
LMArena Chinese13271347
LMArena Japanese12851251
LMArena Russian13141323
LMArena French1351—
LMArena German1341—
LMArena Korean1285—
LMArena Spanish1347—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Command A: 69.1 (#177), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AQwen Plus
LMArena Instruction Following13091303

Long Context Too close to call

Command A: 40.6 (#151), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AQwen Plus
LMArena Longer Query13341324

Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads

Command A: 47.6 (#208), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AQwen Plus
LMArena Text13311326
LMArena Creative Writing13191293
LMArena Multi-Turn13391336
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than Qwen Plus?

Command A and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen Plus share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper