Model comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 vs Qwen Plus

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.7 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen Plus in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads 37.5 to 23.3.
  • Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 and Qwen Plus specifications
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen Plus
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.737.1
Released—2024-01-25
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1120

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 38.4 (#177), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen Plus
LMArena Coding13121328

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 15.7 (#149), Qwen Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen Plus
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard10%—

Reasoning Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 26.3 (#134), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts13161317
Kagi LLM Benchmark—63.3%
DTBench—81.1%
LMCA—24%

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 37.5 (#152), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen Plus
LMArena Math13601326
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—17.8%
MATH Level 5—65.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: —, Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen Plus
GPQA Diamond—48.1%
LMArena Expert—1328

Multilingual Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 43.1 (#187), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen Plus
LMArena Non-English12821310
LMArena Russian12841323
LMArena Chinese—1347
LMArena Japanese—1251

Instruction Following Too close to call

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 69.0 (#178), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen Plus
LMArena Instruction Following13081303

Long Context Too close to call

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 39.5 (#177), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen Plus
LMArena Longer Query12991324

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 52.2 (#175), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen Plus
LMArena Text13201326
LMArena Creative Writing13141293
LMArena Multi-Turn13171336

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 better than Qwen Plus?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.7 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 or Qwen Plus better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.4 vs 38.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 and Qwen Plus share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper