Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen Plus
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.0 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen Plus in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 38.0 to 23.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 40.5% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and 63.3% for Qwen Plus.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1328 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1317 |
| DTBench | 62.8% | 81.1% |
| LMCA | 18.1% | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | — |
| LMArena German | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1303 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |
Long Context Qwen Plus leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1324 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | 1336 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Qwen Plus?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.0 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Qwen Plus?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Qwen Plus better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.5 vs 38.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen Plus share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.