Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-4.5
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-4.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.0 vs 37.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 4 categories and GPT-4.5 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multimodal, where GPT-4.5 leads 37.6 to 29.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 47.2% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and 63.9% for GPT-4.5.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 37.2 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2025-02-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 33 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-4.5 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 35.2% | 39.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1396 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 44.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 75.2% |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
| Cybench | — | 17.5% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1403 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | 136.74 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 34.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 10.3% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 3.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 71.1% |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 64.3% |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.7 |
| LiveBench | — | 69% |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1412 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 37.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 69.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 78.6% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1394 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 68.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 5.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 13.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
Multimodal GPT-4.5 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | 1195 |
| VPCT | 30% | 45% |
Multilingual GPT-4.5 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1413 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1421 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | 1418 |
| LMArena German | 1389 | 1457 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | 1416 |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | 1392 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1419 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-4.5 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1404 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 72.3% |
| IFEval | 81% | — |
Long Context GPT-4.5 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | 63.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1406 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | 1394 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | 1444 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 75.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1258 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 61.5% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than GPT-4.5?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-4.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.0 vs 37.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or GPT-4.5 better for coding?
GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-4.5 share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.5 has 42.