Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Step 3.7 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Step 3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.0 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 1 category and Step 3.7 Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 38.0.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.18 / $1.11 for Step 3.7 Flash.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- Step 3.7 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 256K |
| Max output | 66K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | 694.12 |
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1373 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | — |
| LMArena French | 1388 | — |
| LMArena German | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 81% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | — |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Step 3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.0 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Step 3.7 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash lists at $0.18 and $1.11.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Step 3.7 Flash share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.