Model comparison
Qwen Plus vs Step 3.7 Flash
Qwen Plus and Step 3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.1 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 23.3.
- Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.18 / $1.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
- Step 3.7 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen Plus | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2024-01-25 | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 256K |
| Max output | 33K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads
Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | — |
| DTBench | 81.1% | — |
| LMCA | 24% | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1326 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1324 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen Plus better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Qwen Plus and Step 3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.1 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $1.11 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.
Is Qwen Plus or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.