Model comparison
Command A vs Step 3.7 Flash
Command A and Step 3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 40.0 to 27.2.
- Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.18 / $1.11 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
Side by side
| Command A | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | 256K |
| Max output | 8K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Step 3.7 Flash leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Command A and Step 3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $1.11 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command A or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 256K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.