Model comparison

Command R+ vs Gemma 1.1 7b IT

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.0 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.0

Rank #251 Confirmed

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

30.7

Rank #275 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 1.1 7b IT in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.7 to 30.6.

Side by side

Command R+ and Gemma 1.1 7b IT specifications
Command R+Gemma 1.1 7b IT
ProviderCohereGoogle
Noometry Index32.030.7
Released2024-08-30—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Command R+: 28.6 (#304), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Coding11871084
HumanEval+56.7%35.4%
MBPP+63.5%45%
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—

Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Command R+: 8.9 (#341), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts11861071
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.28—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Command R+: 26.6 (#239), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Math11881107
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Command R+ leads

Command R+: 35.9 (#165), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Expert11741039
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Command R+ leads

Command R+: 38.8 (#222), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Non-English12161052
LMArena Chinese12261060
LMArena French12081064
LMArena German12161054
LMArena Japanese1166971
LMArena Korean1138988
LMArena Russian12271046
LMArena Spanish11891049

Instruction Following Command R+ leads

Command R+: 60.2 (#249), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Instruction Following11971057
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Command R+ leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#214), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Longer Query12311056

Writing & Preference Command R+ leads

Command R+: 43.7 (#223), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Text12291094
LMArena Creative Writing12351059
LMArena Multi-Turn12131040
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Gemma 1.1 7b IT?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.0 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command R+ or Gemma 1.1 7b IT better for coding?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.0 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Gemma 1.1 7b IT share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper