Model comparison
Command R+ vs Laguna M.1
Command R+ and Laguna M.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
PoolsideSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Laguna M.1 leads 23.1 to 9.2.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 32.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 262K |
| Max output | 4K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1349 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Command R+ leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Laguna M.1?
Command R+ and Laguna M.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Command R+ or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Laguna M.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.