Model comparison

Command R+ vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Command R+ and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R+ leads 36.4 to 19.5.

Side by side

Command R+ and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Command R+Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderCohereAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index32.432.7
Released2024-08-30—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding11871210
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11861208
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Command R+ leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math11881208
Omni-MATH—16.1%
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Command R+ leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1174—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Command R+ leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12161160
LMArena Chinese12261192
LMArena Russian12271187
LMArena French1209—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11971186
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—
IFEval—78%

Long Context Command R+ leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12301194

Writing & Preference Command R+ leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12291218
LMArena Creative Writing12351199
LMArena Multi-Turn12131221
WildBench—73.4%
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Command R+ and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Command R+ or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper