Model comparison
Command R+ vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 27.8 to 8.9.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Command R+ | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 32.0 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 4K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R+: 28.6 (#304), MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1469 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R+: 8.9 (#341), MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1450 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.28 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R+: 26.6 (#239), MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R+: 35.9 (#165), MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1459 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command R+: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1245 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R+: 38.8 (#222), MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1467 |
| LMArena French | 1208 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 1304 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1412 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R+: 60.2 (#249), MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1433 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#214), MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1444 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
Command R+: 43.7 (#223), MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1445 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command R+ or MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command R+ or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and MiMo-V2.5 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.