Noometry

Model comparison

Command R+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.0

Rank #251 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

46.7

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 28.6.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderCohereXiaomi
Noometry Index32.046.7
Released2024-08-302026-09-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K1.05M
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.87
Results tracked3414

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 28.6 (#304), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding11871538
LMArena WebDev—1618
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 8.9 (#341), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts11861511
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.28—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 26.6 (#239), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math11881497
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 35.9 (#165), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert11741548
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R+: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1265

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 38.8 (#222), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English12161474
LMArena Chinese12261532
LMArena Russian12271481
LMArena French1208—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 60.2 (#249), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following11971490
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#214), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query12311500

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Command R+: 43.7 (#223), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text12291491
LMArena Creative Writing12351465
LMArena Multi-Turn12131463
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper