Noometry

Model comparison

Command R+ vs Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.0

Rank #251 Confirmed

Grok 4.7 xAI

46.6

Rank #56 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 40.1 to 8.9.
  • Grok 4.7 is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R+Grok 4.7
ProviderCoherexAI
Noometry Index32.046.6
Released2024-08-302026-09-21
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K500K
Max output4K500K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$2
Output $ / M tokens$10$6
Results tracked3421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Command R+: 28.6 (#304), Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.7
LMArena Coding11871423
CursorBench—46.3%
LMArena WebDev—1636
FrontierSWE—29.5%
SciCode—57.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Command R+: 8.9 (#341), Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.7
LMArena Hard Prompts11861409
SimpleBench17.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)—76.8%
CritPt—17.7%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.28—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Command R+: 26.6 (#239), Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.7
LMArena Math11881393
ProofBench—34%
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

Command R+: 35.9 (#165), Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.7
LMArena Expert11741413
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R+: —, Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.7
Furniture Assembly—20.8%

Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads

Command R+: 38.8 (#222), Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.7
LMArena Non-English12161392
LMArena Chinese12261476
LMArena Russian12271396
LMArena French1208—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Command R+: 60.2 (#249), Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following11971406
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Grok 4.7 leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#214), Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.7
LMArena Longer Query12311416

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Command R+: 43.7 (#223), Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok 4.7
LMArena Text12291397
LMArena Creative Writing12351391
LMArena Multi-Turn12131389
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2007
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Grok 4.7 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper