Model comparison

Command R+ vs Phi-4 Mini

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 33× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R+'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Phi-4 Mini Microsoft

30.9

Rank #283 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 2 categories and Phi-4 Mini in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Phi-4 Mini leads 22.4 to 9.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Vectara Hallucination Rate: 6.9% for Command R+ and 23.5% for Phi-4 Mini.
  • Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.

Side by side

Command R+ and Phi-4 Mini specifications
Command R+Phi-4 Mini
ProviderCohereMicrosoft
Noometry Index32.430.9
Released2024-08-302024-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K128K
Max output4K4K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.075
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.30
Results tracked343

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Phi-4 Mini
SciCode—10.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
LMArena Coding1187—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Phi-4 Mini leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Phi-4 Mini
SimpleBench17.4%—
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1186—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Not comparable

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Phi-4 Mini: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Phi-4 Mini
LiveBench Math21.3%—
LMArena Math1188—

Knowledge Command R+ leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Phi-4 Mini
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%23.5%
LMArena Expert1174—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Phi-4 Mini: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Phi-4 Mini
LMArena Non-English1216—
LMArena Chinese1226—
LMArena French1209—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Phi-4 Mini: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Phi-4 Mini
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1197—

Long Context Not comparable

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Phi-4 Mini: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Phi-4 Mini
LMArena Longer Query1230—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Phi-4 Mini: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Phi-4 Mini
LMArena Text1229—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
LMArena Multi-Turn1213—
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Phi-4 Mini?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 33× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R+'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Phi-4 Mini?

Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.1 vs 28.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Phi-4 Mini share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper