Model comparison
Command R vs Falcon-180B
Command R and Falcon-180B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 3 categories and Falcon-180B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command R leads 35.7 to 25.2.
Side by side
| Command R | Falcon-180B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2023-09-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Falcon-180B leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1007 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.13 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |
Math Not comparable
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 65.2% | 70.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |
Multilingual Command R leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Command R leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1047 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Command R leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
| Benchmark | Command R | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1013 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Falcon-180B?
Command R and Falcon-180B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Falcon-180B share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.