Model comparison
Command R vs Pixtral Large
Command R and Pixtral Large score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Pixtral Large leads 21.7 to 13.8.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
Side by side
| Command R | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
| Max output | 4K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Pixtral Large leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Command R | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command R: —, Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Command R | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Command R leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Command R | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Pixtral Large?
Command R and Pixtral Large score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Command R or Pixtral Large?
Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 128K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Pixtral Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.