Model comparison
Command R vs Gemini 1.0 Pro
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 6 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command R leads 25.8 to 8.7.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2023-12-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Command R: 28.8 (#301), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1108 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |
Reasoning Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Command R: 13.3 (#329), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1109 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 116.97 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Command R leads
Command R: 25.8 (#244), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1132 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |
Knowledge Command R leads
Command R: 30.5 (#219), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1059 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | 70% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34% |
Multilingual Command R leads
Command R: 35.9 (#240), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1124 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | 1144 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | 1118 |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Command R: 58.3 (#256), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1114 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Command R leads
Command R: 36.3 (#226), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1132 |
Writing & Preference Command R leads
Command R: 38.4 (#248), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
| Benchmark | Command R | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1130 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1139 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.6 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.