Model comparison
Command R vs Llama 3.2 90B
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command R leads 25.8 to 10.4.
Side by side
| Command R | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command R: 28.8 (#301), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command R: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Command R: 13.3 (#329), Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Command R leads
Command R: 25.8 (#244), Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Command R leads
Command R: 30.5 (#219), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 65.2% | 80.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command R: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R: 35.9 (#240), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R: 58.3 (#256), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#226), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R: 38.4 (#248), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Llama 3.2 90B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.