Model comparison

Llama 3.2 90B vs Mistral Small 3

Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

30.9

Rank #268 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Small 3 in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Small 3 leads 15.3 to 10.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 41% for Llama 3.2 90B and 47.3% for Mistral Small 3.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 90B and Mistral Small 3 specifications
Llama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index27.130.9
Released2024-09-242025-01-30
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked924

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Small 3: 36.0 (#203)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.3%
LMArena Coding—1246
BigCodeBench Complete—50.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73), Mistral Small 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
BALROG27.3%—

Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207), Mistral Small 3: 18.2 (#269)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
Epoch Capabilities Index125.5127.06
Chess Puzzles—0%
EnigmaEval0.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1233

Math Mistral Small 3 leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302), Mistral Small 3: 15.3 (#290)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.6%6.7%
LMArena Math—1240
MATH Level 539.4%—

Knowledge Mistral Small 3 leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269), Mistral Small 3: 25.0 (#258)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
GPQA Diamond41%47.3%
Confabulations—25.2%
LMArena Expert—1202
MMLU80.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119), Mistral Small 3: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
LMArena Vision1000—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Small 3: 37.5 (#231)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
LMArena Non-English—1198
LMArena Chinese—1204
LMArena French—1202
LMArena German—1211
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1188
LMArena Russian—1216

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Small 3: 63.9 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
LMArena Instruction Following—1214

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#206)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
LMArena Longer Query—1246

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Small 3: 32.4 (#275)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
LMArena Text—1234
LMArena Creative Writing—1195
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—707
LMArena Multi-Turn—1217

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Mistral Small 3?

Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Mistral Small 3 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper