Model comparison
Command R vs Llama 2-13B
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MetaSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 2-13B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command R leads 35.9 to 26.7.
Side by side
| Command R | Llama 2-13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 29.1 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 2-13B leads
Command R: 28.8 (#301), Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1062 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Command R leads
Command R: 13.3 (#329), Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1051 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 42.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 105.8 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |
Math Llama 2-13B leads
Command R: 25.8 (#244), Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1065 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |
Knowledge Command R leads
Command R: 30.5 (#219), Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1030 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | 55.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command R: —, Llama 2-13B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |
Multilingual Command R leads
Command R: 35.9 (#240), Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | 1043 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | 1086 |
Instruction Following Command R leads
Command R: 58.3 (#256), Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1046 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Command R leads
Command R: 36.3 (#226), Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1064 |
Writing & Preference Command R leads
Command R: 38.4 (#248), Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1085 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1050 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Llama 2-13B?
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Llama 2-13B better for coding?
Llama 2-13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.4 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Llama 2-13B share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.