Model comparison

Command R vs Solar Pro4

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.0

Rank #267 Confirmed

Solar Pro4 Upstage

41.5

Rank #123 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.7 to 38.4.
  • Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
  • Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R and Solar Pro4 specifications
Command RSolar Pro4
ProviderCohereUpstage
Noometry Index31.041.5
Released2024-08-302026-08-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K524K
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$1.20
Results tracked2918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Solar Pro4 leads

Command R: 28.8 (#301), Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSolar Pro4
LMArena Coding11701439
LMArena WebDev—1371
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—

Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads

Command R: 13.3 (#329), Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSolar Pro4
LMArena Hard Prompts11641398
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
DTBench46.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
LiveBench27.5%—

Math Solar Pro4 leads

Command R: 25.8 (#244), Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSolar Pro4
LMArena Math11551418
LiveBench Math19.4%—

Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads

Command R: 30.5 (#219), Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSolar Pro4
LMArena Expert11381421
MMLU65.2%—

Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads

Command R: 35.9 (#240), Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSolar Pro4
LMArena Non-English11741362
LMArena Chinese11821417
LMArena French11611403
LMArena German11761351
LMArena Japanese11431300
LMArena Korean11621383
LMArena Russian11741360
LMArena Spanish11501408

Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads

Command R: 58.3 (#256), Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSolar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following11671376
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—

Long Context Solar Pro4 leads

Command R: 36.3 (#226), Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSolar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query11981379

Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads

Command R: 38.4 (#248), Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSolar Pro4
LMArena Text11871386
LMArena Creative Writing11701313
LMArena Multi-Turn11631391
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Command R or Solar Pro4?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is Command R or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R and Solar Pro4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper