Noometry

Model comparison

Command R7B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#14); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Command R7B Cohere

32.5

Unranked Sparse

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 42.1 to 26.1.
  • Command R7B is cheaper at $0.0375 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R7BGemini 3.7 Flash
ProviderCohereGoogle
Noometry Index32.559.8
Released2024-12-022026-08-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1.05M
Max output4K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0375$0.75
Output $ / M tokens$0.15$3.75
Results tracked144

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGemini 3.7 Flash
DeepSWE—65.5%
FrontierCode—43.6%
LMArena WebDev—1592
FrontierSWE—20.3%
SciCode—59.8%
LMArena Coding—1497
ALE-Bench—904.3

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Command R7B: 26.1, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGemini 3.7 Flash
APEX-Agents—67.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard32.1%—
Remote Labor Index—5%
GDP.pdf—23.8%

Reasoning Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGemini 3.7 Flash
ARC-AGI-2—84.6%
NYT Connections (extended)—94%
ARC-AGI-1—95.5%
CritPt—14.3%
Chess Puzzles—47%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1494
Mystery Game Puzzles—37%
DTBench—96.8%
LMCA—50.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—157.27

Math Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGemini 3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—71.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—36.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.2%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1507

Knowledge Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGemini 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond—94.8%
SimpleQA Verified—69.2%
LMArena Expert—1508

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision—1316
Furniture Assembly—26.7%

Multilingual Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1484
LMArena Chinese—1548
LMArena French—1505
LMArena German—1498
LMArena Japanese—1512
LMArena Korean—1483
LMArena Russian—1516
LMArena Spanish—1503

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1483

Long Context Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1492

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20)

BenchmarkCommand R7BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text—1486
LMArena Creative Writing—1490
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1723
LMArena Multi-Turn—1489

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R7B better than Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#14); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Command R7B or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Command R7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.0375 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R7B and Gemini 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R7B has 1 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44.

Related comparisons

Go deeper