Model comparison

DBRX vs Gemma 2 27B

DBRX and Gemma 2 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 29.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

DBRX Databricks

29.4

Rank #311 Confirmed

Gemma 2 27B Google

29.4

Rank #312 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 2 27B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DBRX leads 24.3 to 10.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for DBRX and 27.9% for Gemma 2 27B.

Side by side

DBRX and Gemma 2 27B specifications
DBRXGemma 2 27B
ProviderDatabricksGoogle
Noometry Index29.429.4
Released2024-03-272024-06-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—8K
Max output—2K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.65
Output $ / M tokens—$0.65
Results tracked2134

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 2 27B leads

DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGemma 2 27B
LMArena Coding11321211
BigCodeBench Instruct—42.8%
LiveBench Coding—36%
BigCodeBench Complete—52.5%
HumanEval+70.1%—
MBPP+55.8%—

Reasoning DBRX leads

DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGemma 2 27B
LMArena Hard Prompts11131198
LiveBench Reasoning—28.1%
DTBench—48%
LiveBench Data Analysis—47.9%
LMCA—7.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.08
LiveBench—38.2%

Math DBRX leads

DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGemma 2 27B
LMArena Math11451212
MATH Level 511.7%27.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.4%
LiveBench Math—26.5%

Knowledge Gemma 2 27B leads

DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGemma 2 27B
GPQA Diamond32.9%36.5%
LMArena Expert10761172
Confabulations—27.1%
MMLU—75.7%

Multilingual Gemma 2 27B leads

DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGemma 2 27B
LMArena Non-English10711217
LMArena Chinese10681221
LMArena French10961247
LMArena German10571209
LMArena Japanese9901175
LMArena Korean9931174
LMArena Russian10781234
LMArena Spanish10641228

Instruction Following Gemma 2 27B leads

DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGemma 2 27B
LMArena Instruction Following11121206
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.1%

Long Context Gemma 2 27B leads

DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGemma 2 27B
LMArena Longer Query11121231

Writing & Preference Gemma 2 27B leads

DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXGemma 2 27B
LMArena Text11191231
LMArena Creative Writing11041241
LMArena Multi-Turn11111224
LiveBench Language—32.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is DBRX better than Gemma 2 27B?

DBRX and Gemma 2 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 29.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is DBRX or Gemma 2 27B better for coding?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DBRX and Gemma 2 27B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 27B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper