Model comparison
DBRX vs GPT-6.1 Sol
DBRX has enough public results to be ranked (#307); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 32.3.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | GPT-6.1 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2026-09-29 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads
DBRX: 32.3 (#262), GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 75.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DBRX: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 32% |
Reasoning Not comparable
DBRX: 20.5 (#218), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math Not comparable
DBRX: 22.3 (#265), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DBRX: 14.9 (#289), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DBRX: 29.4 (#263), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1095 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DBRX: 57.7 (#265), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DBRX: 33.7 (#253), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DBRX: 33.7 (#271), GPT-6.1 Sol: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than GPT-6.1 Sol?
DBRX has enough public results to be ranked (#307); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DBRX or GPT-6.1 Sol better for coding?
GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and GPT-6.1 Sol share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6.1 Sol has 2.