Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs phi-3-medium 14B

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

phi-3-medium 14B Microsoft

29.7

Rank #306 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in 3 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 93.7 to 27.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 95.4% for GPT-6.1 Sol and 27.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.
  • phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 Solphi-3-medium 14B
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index65.629.7
Released2026-09-292024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Solphi-3-medium 14B
DeepSWE75.2%—
FrontierCode50.2%—
LMArena WebDev1755—
SciCode55.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.6%
LMArena Coding1487—
BigCodeBench Complete—48.7%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26), phi-3-medium 14B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Solphi-3-medium 14B
APEX-Agents60%—
GDP.pdf32%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2), phi-3-medium 14B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Solphi-3-medium 14B
Epoch Capabilities Index166.09121.23
ARC-AGI-294.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)95.5%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
Chess Puzzles61%—
EBR-Bench54.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1466—
Mystery Game Puzzles80%—
Adversarial NLI—55.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—81.4%
HellaSwag—82.4%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Solphi-3-medium 14B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)93.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4100%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench99%—
LMArena Math1464—
MATH Level 5—17.6%

Knowledge GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Solphi-3-medium 14B
GPQA Diamond95.4%27.6%
SimpleQA Verified73.9%—
LMArena Expert1502—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—91.6%
MMLU—78%
OpenBookQA—87.4%
TriviaQA—73.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5), phi-3-medium 14B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Solphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Vision1288—
Furniture Assembly80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46), phi-3-medium 14B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Solphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Non-English1438—
LMArena Chinese1477—
LMArena Russian1455—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29), phi-3-medium 14B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Solphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1468—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54), phi-3-medium 14B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Solphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Longer Query1465—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63), phi-3-medium 14B: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 Solphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Text1447—
LMArena Creative Writing1432—
LMArena Multi-Turn1449—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than phi-3-medium 14B?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6.1 Sol or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and phi-3-medium 14B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper