Model comparison

DBRX vs Llama 4 Scout

DBRX is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.0 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

DBRX Databricks

29.0

Rank #307 Confirmed

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.4

Rank #323 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 4 Scout leads 31.8 to 14.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for DBRX and 62.3% for Llama 4 Scout.

Side by side

DBRX and Llama 4 Scout specifications
DBRXLlama 4 Scout
ProviderDatabricksMeta
Noometry Index29.027.4
Released2024-03-272025-04-05
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked2143

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DBRX leads

DBRX: 32.3 (#262), Llama 4 Scout: 19.9 (#334)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Coding11321286
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9.1%
SciCode—17%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.1%
HumanEval+70.1%—
MBPP+55.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DBRX: —, Llama 4 Scout: 24.4 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXLlama 4 Scout
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.1%

Reasoning DBRX leads

DBRX: 20.5 (#218), Llama 4 Scout: 9.2 (#339)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Hard Prompts11131266
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36.9%
ARC-AGI-1—0.5%
CritPt—0%
DTBench—57.9%
LMCA—12%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129.64
ForecastBench—57.5

Math DBRX leads

DBRX: 22.3 (#265), Llama 4 Scout: 18.4 (#280)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Math11451286
MATH Level 511.7%62.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.8%
Omni-MATH—37.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0%

Knowledge Llama 4 Scout leads

DBRX: 14.9 (#289), Llama 4 Scout: 31.8 (#208)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXLlama 4 Scout
GPQA Diamond32.9%51.8%
LMArena Expert10761236
MMLU-Pro—74.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.7%
GPQA (HELM)—50.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

DBRX: —, Llama 4 Scout: 31.6 (#98)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Vision—1118
SpatialViz-Bench—34.2%

Multilingual Llama 4 Scout leads

DBRX: 29.4 (#263), Llama 4 Scout: 41.3 (#207)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Non-English10711253
LMArena Chinese10681256
LMArena French10951283
LMArena German10571274
LMArena Japanese9901209
LMArena Korean9931207
LMArena Russian10781263
LMArena Spanish10641277

Instruction Following Llama 4 Scout leads

DBRX: 57.7 (#265), Llama 4 Scout: 66.0 (#212)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Instruction Following11121248
IFEval—81.8%

Long Context DBRX leads

DBRX: 33.7 (#253), Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Longer Query11121265
Fiction.LiveBench—36%

Writing & Preference Llama 4 Scout leads

DBRX: 33.7 (#271), Llama 4 Scout: 37.1 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Text11191279
LMArena Creative Writing11041249
LMArena Multi-Turn11111281
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—783
WildBench—78%

Frequently asked questions

Is DBRX better than Llama 4 Scout?

DBRX is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.0 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is DBRX or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?

DBRX scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 19.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DBRX and Llama 4 Scout share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper