Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#40); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 52.8 to 30.7.
Side by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 34.5 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | 2026-09-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 393K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 25 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1620 |
| SciCode | — | 51.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1511 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,092 |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 62.18 | 155.01 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| CritPt | — | 14.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1485 |
| DTBench | — | 89.9% |
| LMCA | — | 47% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 46.3% |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 54% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1493 |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1505 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1452 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1506 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1473 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1499 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1475 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1436 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1540 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#40); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better for coding?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25.