Model comparison
Deepseek Coder v2 vs Laguna M.1
Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
PoolsideSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 34.9 to 21.1.
Side by side
| Deepseek Coder v2 | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 32.5 |
| Released | 2024-06-17 | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1349 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |
Math Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LMArena Math | 1241 | — |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | — |
| LMArena French | 1185 | — |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Laguna M.1?
Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Laguna M.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.