Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 7b Instruct leads 27.8 to 8.1.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 24.8 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek LLM 67B leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1016 |
Reasoning Olmo 7b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 993 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.54 | — |
Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318), Olmo 7b Instruct: 27.8 (#234)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1018 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
Multilingual DeepSeek LLM 67B leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.1 (#286)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1013 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 946 |
Instruction Following DeepSeek LLM 67B leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.3 (#296)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | — |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek LLM 67B leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277), Olmo 7b Instruct: 26.0 (#298)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.3 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.