Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs o3-pro

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and o3-pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.6 vs 42.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus DeepSeek

42.6

Rank #96 Confirmed

o3-pro OpenAI

42.7

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 2 categories and o3-pro in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.1 to 43.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 57.4% for DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and 72.1% for o3-pro.
  • DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is cheaper at $0.30 / $1 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
  • o3-pro accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 164K.
  • DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and o3-pro specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminuso3-pro
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Noometry Index42.642.7
Released2025-09-222025-06-10
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window164K200K
Max output66K100K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$20
Output $ / M tokens$1$80
Results tracked1612

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-pro leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 41.5 (#114), o3-pro: 55.1 (#22)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-Terminuso3-pro
Aider Polyglot—84.9%
SciCode40.6%—
WeirdML—58.2%
LMArena Coding1426—
ALE-Bench745.17—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 25.7 (#126), o3-pro: 24.1 (#152)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-Terminuso3-pro
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%72.1%
DTBench81.3%86.9%
LMCA28.6%38.5%
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
ARC-AGI-1—59.3%
CritPt1.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1427—
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.43

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 35.7 (#138), o3-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-Terminuso3-pro
LMArena Math1402—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, o3-pro: 29.0 (#234)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-Terminuso3-pro
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.3 (#87), o3-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-Terminuso3-pro
LMArena Non-English1407—
LMArena Russian1434—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.4 (#96), o3-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-Terminuso3-pro
LMArena Instruction Following1406—

Long Context o3-pro leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.5 (#88), o3-pro: 72.1 (#1)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-Terminuso3-pro
Fiction.LiveBench—97.2%
LMArena Longer Query1426—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.3 (#87), o3-pro: 57.1 (#128)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-Terminuso3-pro
LMArena Text1420—
LMArena Creative Writing1404—
Short-Story Creative Writing—84.4%
LMArena Multi-Turn1411—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than o3-pro?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and o3-pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.6 vs 42.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or o3-pro?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or o3-pro better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.1 versus 41.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

o3-pro does, with 200K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and o3-pro share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper