Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-4.7-Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.7-Flash costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

52.8

Rank #38 Confirmed

GLM-4.7-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.8

Rank #180 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 66.7 to 36.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 98.3% for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 58.3% for GLM-4.7-Flash.
  • GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
ProviderDeepSeekZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index52.838.8
Released2026-09-092026-01-19
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M200K
Max output393K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.06
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$0.40
Results tracked3721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.9 (#32), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Coding15061383
LMArena WebDev1619—
SciCode51.9%—
ALE-Bench1,092—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 31.2 (#69), GLM-4.7-Flash: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
APEX-Agents39.5%—
GDP.pdf19.8%—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 50.2 (#36), GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14831356
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench89.9%—
LMCA47%—
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.9—

Math DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 66.7 (#25), GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.3%58.3%
LMArena Math14771355
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)67.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
ProofBench54%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 57.9 (#38), GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
GPQA Diamond89.8%60.5%
LMArena Expert15061357
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 39.1 (#61), GLM-4.7-Flash: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Vision1277—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.0 (#35), GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Non-English14481330
LMArena Chinese14971403
LMArena French14521332
LMArena German14841337
LMArena Korean14521283
LMArena Russian14711332
LMArena Spanish14591350
LMArena Japanese1412—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.3 (#26), GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14741327

Long Context DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#47), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14751345

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.4 (#48), GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Text14621351
LMArena Creative Writing14351297
EQ-Bench Creative Writing15401125
LMArena Multi-Turn14571342

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than GLM-4.7-Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.7-Flash costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM-4.7-Flash?

GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.9 versus 40.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM-4.7-Flash share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 37 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper