Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Olmo 7b Instruct

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 63.8 to 25.8.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
DeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 7b Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index53.630.3
Released2026-04-24—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked4110

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding14571016
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1444993
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.49—

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math14271018
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 7b Instruct
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—
LMArena Expert1441—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1420977
LMArena Chinese14681014
LMArena Russian1428947
LMArena French1439—
LMArena German1418—
LMArena Japanese1406—
LMArena Korean1384—
LMArena Spanish1436—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1421978

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1434—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text14321032
LMArena Creative Writing1403990
LMArena Multi-Turn14491007
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper