Model comparison
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 56.5 to 14.8.
Side by side
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 54.3 | 29.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 393K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.66 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.98 | — |
| Results tracked | 48 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.4 (#34), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1470 | 1101 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.6% | — |
| FrontierCode | 28.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | — |
| SciCode | 51% | — |
| WeirdML | 66.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 20.3% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,403 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.8 (#58), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 47.3% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,285 | — |
Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.5 (#24), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1461 | 1100 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 53.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 91.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| CritPt | 18% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 15.9% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 43% | — |
| DTBench | 93.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 30.3% |
| LMCA | 45.5% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 40% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 58.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.31 | — |
| ForecastBench | 56.1 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 77% |
| LiveBench | — | 24% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.8 (#30), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1151 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 64.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 50% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#31), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1464 | 1067 |
| GPQA Diamond | 91.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 52.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 90.7% |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 88% |
| TriviaQA | — | 58.1% |
Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.4 (#45), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1486 | 1061 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | 1135 |
| LMArena German | 1458 | 1080 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1445 | 966 |
| LMArena Korean | 1447 | 894 |
| LMArena Russian | 1453 | 1111 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1458 | 1111 |
Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.1 (#47), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1448 | 1087 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 47.2% |
Long Context DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#51), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1458 | 1088 |
| CL-bench Life | 13.5% | — |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.5 (#46), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1451 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1446 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1467 | 1068 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1553 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1166 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 12.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?
DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.4 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.