Model comparison
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Wizardlm 13b
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 56.5 to 19.4.
Side by side
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 54.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 393K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.66 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.98 | — |
| Results tracked | 48 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.4 (#34), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1470 | 1035 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.6% | — |
| FrontierCode | 28.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | — |
| SciCode | 51% | — |
| WeirdML | 66.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,403 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.8 (#58), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 47.3% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,285 | — |
Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.5 (#24), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1461 | 1018 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 53.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 91.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| CritPt | 18% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 43% | — |
| DTBench | 93.9% | — |
| LMCA | 45.5% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 40% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.31 | — |
| ForecastBench | 56.1 | — |
Math DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.8 (#30), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1017 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 64.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 50% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#31), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 52.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1464 | — |
Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.4 (#45), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1486 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | — |
| LMArena German | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1453 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1458 | — |
Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.1 (#47), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1448 | 1048 |
Long Context DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#51), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1458 | 1054 |
| CL-bench Life | 13.5% | — |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.5 (#46), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1451 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1446 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1467 | 1047 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1553 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1166 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Wizardlm 13b?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.4 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.