Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Wizardlm 13b

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.2

Rank #32 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.8 to 19.4.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 13b
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index54.231.4
Released2026-05-19—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$9—
Results tracked5410

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding14921035
SWE-bench Verified79.3%—
DeepSWE37.4%—
LMArena WebDev1499—
SciCode53.1%—
WeirdML62.6%—
ALE-Bench911.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 13b
APEX-Agents27.5%—
GBAEval6.7%—
GDP.pdf14%—
Vending-Bench 25,396—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts14881018
ARC-AGI-272.1%—
SimpleBench76.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.6%—
ARC-AGI-192.5%—
CritPt13.1%—
Chess Puzzles50%—
EnigmaEval25.4%—
EBR-Bench4.8%—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA47.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.46—
ForecastBench59—

Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math15041017
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)62.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
ProofBench31%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 13b
GPQA Diamond92.8%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—
LMArena Expert1495—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 13b
LMArena Vision1310—
Blueprint-Bench 233.6%—
LMArena Document1463—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English14761034
LMArena Chinese15261023
LMArena French1490—
LMArena German1492—
LMArena Japanese1486—
LMArena Korean1451—
LMArena Russian1493—
LMArena Spanish1480—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following14671048

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query14821054

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text14821077
LMArena Creative Writing14701091
LMArena Multi-Turn14811047
EQ-Bench 41087—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Wizardlm 13b?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper