Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen-14B

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.2

Rank #32 Confirmed

Qwen-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #275 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.8 to 19.6.
  • Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 FlashQwen-14B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.231.4
Released2026-05-192023-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$9—
Results tracked5418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Coding14921071
SWE-bench Verified79.3%—
DeepSWE37.4%—
LMArena WebDev1499—
SciCode53.1%—
WeirdML62.6%—
ALE-Bench911.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114), Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen-14B
APEX-Agents27.5%—
GBAEval6.7%—
GDP.pdf14%—
Vending-Bench 25,396—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts14881027
Epoch Capabilities Index154.46113.03
ARC-AGI-272.1%—
SimpleBench76.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.6%—
ARC-AGI-192.5%—
CritPt13.1%—
Chess Puzzles50%—
EnigmaEval25.4%—
EBR-Bench4.8%—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA47.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard—55%
ForecastBench59—
LAMBADA—71.1%
PIQA—79.9%

Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Math15041068
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)62.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
ProofBench31%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—
GSM8K—61.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11), Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen-14B
GPQA Diamond92.8%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—
LMArena Expert1495—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.4%
BoolQ—86.2%
MMLU—66.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15), Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Vision1310—
Blueprint-Bench 233.6%—
LMArena Document1463—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Non-English14761041
LMArena Chinese15261077
LMArena French1490—
LMArena German1492—
LMArena Japanese1486—
LMArena Korean1451—
LMArena Russian1493—
LMArena Spanish1480—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Instruction Following14671031

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Longer Query14821028

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Text14821051
LMArena Creative Writing14701028
LMArena Multi-Turn14811022
EQ-Bench 41087—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Qwen-14B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper