Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Granite 4.2 30b

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Granite 4.2 30b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 41.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 6 categories and Granite 4.2 30b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 27.8 to 17.0.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Granite 4.2 30b specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 30b
ProviderBaiduIBM
Noometry Index41.841.8
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2011

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Coding14551396

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Hard Prompts14451374
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
Thematic Generalization41.7%—

Math Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Math1437—

Knowledge Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Expert14281406

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Non-English14361340
LMArena Chinese15121414
LMArena Russian14461343
LMArena French1467—
LMArena German1460—
LMArena Japanese1382—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Instruction Following14131347

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Longer Query14221359

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Text14451361
LMArena Creative Writing14261288
LMArena Multi-Turn14341339

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Granite 4.2 30b?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Granite 4.2 30b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 41.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Granite 4.2 30b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper