Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Muse Glimmer

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Muse Glimmer in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Glimmer leads 25.7 to 17.0.
  • Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Muse Glimmer specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Glimmer
ProviderBaiduMeta
Noometry Index41.841.7
Released—2026-08-10
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2015

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Glimmer
LMArena Coding14551416
LMArena WebDev—1355
SciCode—44.9%

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Glimmer
LMArena Hard Prompts14451396
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
CritPt—2.6%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—

Math Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Glimmer
LMArena Math14371417

Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Glimmer
LMArena Expert14281386

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Muse Glimmer: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Glimmer
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English14361384
LMArena Chinese15121412
LMArena Russian14461390
LMArena French1467—
LMArena German1460—
LMArena Japanese1382—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following14131375

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query14221382

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Glimmer
LMArena Text14451389
LMArena Creative Writing14261339
LMArena Multi-Turn14341399

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Muse Glimmer?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper