Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.8 Max in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 54.4 to 17.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 88.3% for Qwen3.8 Max.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderBaiduAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.856.8
Released—2026-08-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked2039

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Coding14551502
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.8 Max
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%88.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14451496
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Math14371499
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Expert14281507
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%

Multimodal ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision12491314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English14361472
LMArena Chinese15121538
LMArena French14671503
LMArena German14601483
LMArena Japanese13821467
LMArena Korean14061461
LMArena Russian14461481
LMArena Spanish14731492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following14131479

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query14221489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text14451483
LMArena Creative Writing14261479
LMArena Multi-Turn14341489

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen3.8 Max share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper