Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 4.6 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.4 to 17.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 80% for Grok 4.6.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.6
ProviderBaiduxAI
Noometry Index41.856.9
Released—2026-08-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked2049

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.6
LMArena Coding14551465
DeepSWE—67.5%
FrontierCode—48%
CursorBench—41.4%
LMArena WebDev—1617
FrontierSWE—25.3%
SciCode—56.5%
WeirdML—67.3%
ALE-Bench—1,508

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.6
APEX-Agents—65.3%
GDP.pdf—17.2%
Vending-Bench 2—9,047

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.6
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%80%
LMArena Hard Prompts14451447
ARC-AGI-2—67.1%
SimpleBench—75.9%
ARC-AGI-1—87.5%
CritPt—19.7%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
EBR-Bench—30.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
DTBench—97.3%
LMCA—48.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.44

Math Grok 4.6 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.6
LMArena Math14371423
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—66%
FrontierMath Tier 4—31.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—51%

Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.6
LMArena Expert14281467
GPQA Diamond—94%
SimpleQA Verified—49.3%

Multimodal Grok 4.6 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.6
LMArena Vision12491263
Blueprint-Bench 2—33.2%
Furniture Assembly—40%
LMArena Document—1452

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.6
LMArena Non-English14361420
LMArena Chinese15121480
LMArena French14671461
LMArena German14601431
LMArena Japanese13821376
LMArena Korean14061397
LMArena Russian14461422
LMArena Spanish14731404

Instruction Following Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.6
LMArena Instruction Following14131431

Long Context Grok 4.6 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.6
LMArena Longer Query14221454

Writing & Preference Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.6
LMArena Text14451428
LMArena Creative Writing14261428
LMArena Multi-Turn14341425

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Grok 4.6 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Grok 4.6 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper