Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.4 to 27.8.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Grok 4.6 specifications
Granite 4.2 30bGrok 4.6
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index41.856.9
Released—2026-08-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1149

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.6
LMArena Coding13961465
DeepSWE—67.5%
FrontierCode—48%
CursorBench—41.4%
LMArena WebDev—1617
FrontierSWE—25.3%
SciCode—56.5%
WeirdML—67.3%
ALE-Bench—1,508

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.6
APEX-Agents—65.3%
GDP.pdf—17.2%
Vending-Bench 2—9,047

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.6
LMArena Hard Prompts13741447
ARC-AGI-2—67.1%
SimpleBench—75.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—80%
ARC-AGI-1—87.5%
CritPt—19.7%
Chess Puzzles—40%
EBR-Bench—30.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
DTBench—97.3%
LMCA—48.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.44

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.6
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—66%
FrontierMath Tier 4—31.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—51%
LMArena Math—1423

Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.6
LMArena Expert14061467
GPQA Diamond—94%
SimpleQA Verified—49.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.6
LMArena Vision—1263
Blueprint-Bench 2—33.2%
Furniture Assembly—40%
LMArena Document—1452

Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.6
LMArena Non-English13401420
LMArena Chinese14141480
LMArena Russian13431422
LMArena French—1461
LMArena German—1431
LMArena Japanese—1376
LMArena Korean—1397
LMArena Spanish—1404

Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.6
LMArena Instruction Following13471431

Long Context Grok 4.6 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.6
LMArena Longer Query13591454

Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.6
LMArena Text13611428
LMArena Creative Writing12881428
LMArena Multi-Turn13391425

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Grok 4.6 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Grok 4.6 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper